PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. ENPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNG vs. ENPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly lower than ENPH's 70.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has underperformed ENPH with an annualized return of 22.78%, while ENPH has yielded a comparatively higher 39.19% annualized return.


LNG

1D
0.47%
1M
0.79%
YTD
24.74%
6M
28.05%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
23.34%
10Y*
22.78%

ENPH

1D
-0.62%
1M
29.98%
YTD
70.33%
6M
69.64%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
-32.77%
5Y*
-17.99%
10Y*
39.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. ENPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
24.74%-8.70%27.18%15.02%49.30%69.48%-1.70%3.18%9.94%29.95%
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
70.33%-53.33%-48.02%-50.13%44.83%4.26%571.53%452.43%96.27%138.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and ENPH is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.18

The correlation between LNG and ENPH shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNG:

$50.79B

ENPH:

$7.17B

EPS

LNG:

$6.80

ENPH:

$0.92

PE Ratio

LNG:

35.48

ENPH:

59.58

PEG Ratio

LNG:

0.19

ENPH:

1.36

PS Ratio

LNG:

2.58

ENPH:

5.20

PB Ratio

LNG:

13.53

ENPH:

6.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNG:

$20.28B

ENPH:

$1.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNG:

$5.52B

ENPH:

$619.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

LNG:

$5.81B

ENPH:

$189.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNG vs. ENPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ENPH
ENPH Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ENPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENPH Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ENPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENPH Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. ENPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNGENPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.14

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.52

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

0.92

-0.61

LNG vs. ENPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the ENPH Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and ENPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNG vs. ENPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, roughly equal to the maximum ENPH drawdown of -95.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and ENPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGENPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.84%

-95.97%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.09%

-43.13%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-86.23%

+61.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-92.23%

+67.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.53%

-92.23%

+34.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.55%

-83.75%

+65.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.14%

-50.57%

+7.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

24.10%

-12.22%

Volatility

LNG vs. ENPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.19%, while Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) has a volatility of 40.41%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGENPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

40.41%

-33.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.49%

66.31%

-44.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.02%

86.85%

-59.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.27%

70.23%

-39.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.50%

78.26%

-45.76%

Dividends

LNG vs. ENPH - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while ENPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.90%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%

Financials

LNG vs. ENPH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Enphase Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
5.87B
282.90M
(LNG) Total Revenue
(ENPH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNG vs. ENPH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Enphase Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
35.5%
Portfolio components
LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ENPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.39M and revenue of 282.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

ENPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 282.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.5%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.

ENPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -20.31M and revenue of 282.90M, resulting in a net margin of -7.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LNG and ENPH have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENPH has higher volatility (40.41%) compared to LNG (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs ENPH's -95.97%.

ENPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNG and ENPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer