PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LNG is traded in USD, while ENB-PP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ENB-PP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than ENB-PP.TO's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed ENB-PP.TO with an annualized return of 22.78%, while ENB-PP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.54% annualized return.


LNG

1D
0.47%
1M
0.08%
YTD
24.74%
6M
28.05%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
23.34%
10Y*
22.78%

ENB-PP.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
7.63%
6M
10.07%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
24.74%-8.70%27.18%15.02%49.30%69.48%-1.70%3.18%9.94%29.95%
ENB-PP.TO
Enbridge Inc.
7.63%24.97%20.28%17.54%-22.53%44.86%-1.66%11.22%-22.43%28.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and ENB-PP.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2012

0.12

The correlation between LNG and ENB-PP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ENB-PP.TO
ENB-PP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ENB-PP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNGENB-PP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.47

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

4.82

-4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

14.65

-14.34

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the ENB-PP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and ENB-PP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than ENB-PP.TO's maximum drawdown of -64.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and ENB-PP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGENB-PP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.84%

-64.12%

-33.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.09%

-4.70%

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-10.26%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-33.10%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.53%

-57.82%

+0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.55%

-2.81%

-15.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.14%

-21.31%

-21.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

1.54%

+10.34%

Volatility

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PP.TO) at 1.87%. This indicates that LNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB-PP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGENB-PP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

1.87%

+5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.49%

5.85%

+15.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.02%

8.81%

+18.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.27%

14.48%

+15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.50%

19.01%

+13.49%

Dividends

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than ENB-PP.TO's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENB-PP.TO
Enbridge Inc.
6.15%6.55%6.81%6.54%5.26%4.14%7.62%6.60%6.15%4.92%5.59%5.93%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.90%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LNG vs. ENB-PP.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Enbridge Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
5.87B
(LNG) Total Revenue
(ENB-PP.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LNG values in USD, ENB-PP.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


LNG and ENB-PP.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNG and ENB-PP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer