LNG vs. ECO

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp) are both stocks. LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while ECO operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past year, LNG returned 11.03% vs 156.80% for ECO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LNG vs. ECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 33.71% return, which is significantly lower than ECO's 73.56% return.

LNG

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 7.70%
• 6M: 33.86%
• YTD: 33.71%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 25.25%
• 10Y*: 21.39%

ECO

• 1D: 5.19%
• 1M: 10.41%
• 6M: 54.36%
• YTD: 73.56%
• 1Y: 156.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. ECO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	33.71%	-8.70%	27.18%	-0.65%
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp	73.56%	71.94%	-11.70%	-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and ECO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023	0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap LNG : $54.20B ECO : $1.80B
EPS LNG : $6.86 ECO : $5.73
PE Ratio LNG : 37.72 ECO : 9.59
PEG Ratio LNG : 0.20 ECO : 0.91
PS Ratio LNG : 2.74 ECO : 3.96
PB Ratio LNG : 14.50 ECO : 2.89
Total Revenue (TTM) LNG : $20.28B ECO : $481.57M
Gross Profit (TTM) LNG : $5.52B ECO : $274.61M
EBITDA (TTM) LNG : $5.81B ECO : $284.05M

Return for Risk

LNG vs. ECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 56
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

ECO

ECO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. ECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LNG	ECO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	3.96	-3.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	4.25	-3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.50	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	9.25	-8.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.90	25.78	-24.88

LNG vs. ECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the ECO Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and ECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LNG vs. ECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than ECO's maximum drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and ECO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNG	ECO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.84%	-46.15%	-51.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.09%	-17.66%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.69%	-3.00%	-9.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.08%	-14.89%	-28.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.88%	6.33%	+6.55%

Volatility

LNG vs. ECO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.89%, while Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a volatility of 15.55%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNG	ECO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	15.55%	-7.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.45%	31.07%	-8.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.34%	41.32%	-13.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.37%	42.27%	-11.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.28%	42.27%	-9.99%

Dividends

LNG vs. ECO - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than ECO's 9.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp	9.10%	6.26%	15.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.84%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%

Financials

LNG vs. ECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

ECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.

ECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNG and ECO in my portfolio?

LNG and ECO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LNG or ECO?

ECO has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to LNG (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs ECO's -46.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.