LMT vs. VEA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) is a stock, while VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Over the past 10 years, LMT returned 11.37%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VEA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LMT vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 11.37%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.

LMT

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 4.60%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 13.84%
• 1Y: 18.25%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: 9.78%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

VEA

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 6M: 16.65%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMT vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	13.04%	2.47%	10.02%	-4.31%	40.48%	3.15%	-6.49%	52.55%	-16.35%	31.77%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	14.73%	35.16%	3.15%	17.93%	-15.34%	11.66%	9.71%	22.62%	-14.75%	26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and VEA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between LMT and VEA has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LMT vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT

LMT Risk / Return Rank: 60
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 60

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 62
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMT	VEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	1.81	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	2.50	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.33	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	2.58	-1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	9.92	-8.23

LMT vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMT vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and VEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMT	VEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.29%	-60.68%	-18.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.15%	-11.63%	-13.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.79%	-13.45%	-18.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.79%	-29.71%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.67%	-35.73%	-0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.63%	-1.06%	-18.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.83%	-13.28%	-13.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.81%	3.02%	+7.79%

Volatility

LMT vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 7.02% and 6.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMT	VEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	6.84%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.04%	14.38%	+5.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.71%	16.58%	+10.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.99%	16.72%	+6.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.76%	17.40%	+6.36%

Dividends

LMT vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	2.53%	2.76%	2.62%	2.68%	2.34%	2.98%	2.76%	2.31%	3.13%	2.32%	2.71%	2.83%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.62%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMT and VEA in my portfolio?

LMT and VEA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMT or VEA?

LMT has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to VEA (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs VEA's -60.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.