LMT vs. PRU

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) and PRU (Prudential Financial, Inc.) are both stocks. LMT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while PRU operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LMT returned 11.04%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for PRU. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LMT vs. PRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than PRU's -4.78% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has outperformed PRU with an annualized return of 11.04%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.

LMT

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 6M: 17.20%
• 1Y: 11.67%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: 11.04%

PRU

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: -4.78%
• 6M: -3.76%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: 4.24%
• 10Y*: 7.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMT vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	9.57%	2.47%	10.02%	-4.31%	40.48%	3.15%	-6.49%	52.55%	-16.35%	31.77%
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc.	-4.78%	0.18%	19.46%	10.09%	-3.86%	45.32%	-11.40%	20.10%	-26.46%	13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and PRU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2001	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between LMT and PRU has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LMT : $121.04B PRU : $36.55B
EPS LMT : $20.61 PRU : $9.85
PE Ratio LMT : 25.41 PRU : 10.62
PS Ratio LMT : 1.62 PRU : 0.78
Total Revenue (TTM) LMT : $75.12B PRU : $47.43B
Gross Profit (TTM) LMT : $7.37B PRU : $14.72B
EBITDA (TTM) LMT : $8.09B PRU : $4.02B

Return for Risk

LMT vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT

LMT Risk / Return Rank: 53
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 54

PRU

PRU Risk / Return Rank: 47
PRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PRU Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PRU Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMT	PRU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	0.28	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	0.51	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.07	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	0.30	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.21	0.65	+0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMT vs. PRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the PRU Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and PRU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMT	PRU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	0.28	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.16	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.25	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.21	+0.17

Drawdowns

LMT vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and PRU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMT	PRU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.29%	-88.53%	+9.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.15%	-21.46%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.79%	-25.66%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.79%	-33.11%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.67%	-65.89%	+29.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.09%	-12.70%	-9.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.84%	-18.32%	-8.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.41%	9.82%	+0.59%

Volatility

LMT vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is 5.27%, while Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that LMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMT	PRU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	5.85%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.58%	17.54%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.59%	22.61%	+3.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.87%	25.82%	-2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.71%	31.84%	-8.13%

Dividends

LMT vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than PRU's 5.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	2.61%	2.76%	2.62%	2.68%	2.34%	2.98%	2.76%	2.31%	3.13%	2.32%	2.71%	2.83%
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc.	5.26%	4.78%	4.39%	4.82%	4.83%	4.25%	5.64%	4.27%	4.41%	2.61%	2.69%	3.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMT and PRU in my portfolio?

LMT and PRU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMT or PRU?

PRU has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to LMT (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs PRU's -88.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.