PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMT vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMT vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than NEE's 10.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has underperformed NEE with an annualized return of 10.29%, while NEE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.


LMT

1D
1.47%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
6.58%
6M
5.63%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
6.24%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
10.29%

NEE

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.54%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMT vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
6.58%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
10.88%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%30.06%42.69%14.30%34.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and NEE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2003

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between LMT and NEE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

LMT:

$20.67

NEE:

$5.91

PE Ratio

LMT:

24.65

NEE:

14.84

PS Ratio

LMT:

1.57

NEE:

4.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMT:

$75.12B

NEE:

$27.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMT:

$7.37B

NEE:

$13.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

LMT:

$8.09B

NEE:

$14.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMT vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMTNEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.08

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

5.39

-4.27

LMT vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMT vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMTNEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

-47.81%

-31.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.87%

-14.53%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.79%

-34.57%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-44.97%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

-44.97%

+8.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.22%

-9.67%

-14.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.83%

-8.93%

-17.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.59%

5.60%

+5.99%

Volatility

LMT vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 6.42%. This indicates that LMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMTNEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

6.42%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

16.74%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.67%

23.54%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

26.89%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.87%

25.48%

-1.61%

Dividends

LMT vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than NEE's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.68%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.71%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Financials

LMT vs. NEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.02B
6.70B
(LMT) Total Revenue
(NEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LMT vs. NEE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lockheed Martin Corporation and NextEra Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.5%
0
Portfolio components
LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

NEE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

NEE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

NEE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LMT and NEE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMT has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to NEE (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs NEE's -47.81%.

NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMT and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer