PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMSIX vs. FKRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSIX achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's -1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LMSIX has underperformed FKRCX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while FKRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


LMSIX

1D
0.93%
1M
5.97%
YTD
19.79%
6M
17.39%
1Y
43.89%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
11.99%

FKRCX

1D
-1.37%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
-5.57%
1Y
74.96%
3Y*
52.41%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
19.79%20.19%9.90%18.80%-15.16%29.12%11.29%20.75%-15.61%8.81%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
-1.84%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSIX and FKRCX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2000

0.29

The correlation between LMSIX and FKRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (10 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMSIX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMSIX
LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMSIXFKRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

2.21

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.16

6.07

+11.09

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSIX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and FKRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMSIXFKRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.16%

-78.85%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-34.78%

+25.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-34.78%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.66%

-48.79%

+21.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.26%

-49.54%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-27.05%

+27.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-33.73%

+22.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

12.61%

-9.95%

Volatility

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) is 5.69%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that LMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMSIXFKRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

16.59%

-10.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.51%

37.75%

-24.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.87%

44.23%

-25.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

34.31%

-12.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

33.13%

-9.59%

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMSIX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, less than FKRCX's 10.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
10.95%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%0.00%
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
6.73%6.35%4.05%3.70%5.18%21.64%3.60%1.48%11.17%8.85%4.79%7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMSIX and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to LMSIX (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSIX dropped -61.16% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMSIX and FKRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer