LMSIX vs. CSMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX).
LMSIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Mar 13, 2000. CSMDX is managed by Copeland Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017.
Performance
LMSIX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMSIX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund | -2.37% | 20.19% | 9.90% | 18.80% | -15.16% | 29.12% | 11.29% | 20.75% | -15.61% | 7.18% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 1.51% | 2.72% | 2.24% | 18.89% | -14.89% | 22.60% | 8.29% | 29.90% | -5.20% | 10.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMSIX achieves a -2.37% return, which is significantly lower than CSMDX's 1.51% return.
LMSIX
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
CSMDX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 9.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMSIX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMSIX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
LMSIX
CSMDX
LMSIX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMSIX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 0.51 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 0.89 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.12 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 0.58 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | 2.19 | +5.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMSIX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.51 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.21 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.40 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMSIX and CSMDX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LMSIX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison
LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than CSMDX's 3.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund | 6.50% | 6.35% | 4.05% | 3.70% | 5.18% | 21.64% | 3.60% | 1.48% | 11.17% | 8.85% | 4.79% | 7.52% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.09% | 3.14% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 4.07% | 6.67% | 0.38% | 2.61% | 4.40% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LMSIX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and CSMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMSIX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.16% | -37.28% | -23.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -13.33% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.66% | -24.60% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.22% | -9.20% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.95% | -5.84% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 3.52% | -0.28% |
Volatility
LMSIX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 4.58%. This indicates that LMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMSIX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 4.58% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 10.22% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.28% | 19.31% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 18.12% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 19.25% | +4.21% |