PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMSIX vs. DFISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSIX achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, LMSIX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.


LMSIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.47%
YTD
14.83%
6M
15.23%
1Y
42.03%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
11.10%

DFISX

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.57%
YTD
9.45%
6M
13.28%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
8.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
14.83%20.19%9.90%18.80%-15.16%29.12%11.29%20.75%-15.61%8.81%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
9.45%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.42%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSIX and DFISX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2000

0.61

The correlation between LMSIX and DFISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMSIX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMSIX
LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMSIXDFISXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

1.97

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

2.77

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

2.32

+2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.02

8.59

+7.44

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSIX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMSIXDFISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.97

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.52

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.46

-0.12

Drawdowns

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, roughly equal to the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and DFISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMSIXDFISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.16%

-60.66%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-11.96%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-13.68%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.66%

-35.06%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.26%

-43.00%

-7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.49%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-11.65%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.24%

-0.60%

Volatility

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 3.81%. This indicates that LMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMSIXDFISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.81%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

11.06%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

13.79%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

15.89%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.50%

16.20%

+7.30%

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMSIX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than DFISX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.87%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
5.53%6.35%4.05%3.70%5.18%21.64%3.60%1.48%11.17%8.85%4.79%7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMSIX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMSIX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to DFISX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSIX dropped -61.16% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMSIX and DFISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer