LMGNX vs. FKDNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LMGNX (ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I) and FKDNX (Franklin DynaTech Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, LMGNX returned 10.10%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for FKDNX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LMGNX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKDNX.

Performance

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGNX achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGNX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 10.10%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.

LMGNX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 6.24%
• 1Y: 12.54%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 4.78%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

FKDNX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 5.66%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 28.27%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 10.69%
• 10Y*: 18.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMGNX ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I	5.94%	23.05%	7.48%	14.30%	-21.16%	3.99%	24.92%	31.43%	-9.37%	36.41%
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	12.20%	18.59%	30.57%	44.42%	-40.30%	12.53%	57.68%	36.36%	2.85%	39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGNX and FKDNX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2002	0.84

The correlation between LMGNX and FKDNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMGNX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGNX

LMGNX Risk / Return Rank: 10
LMGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LMGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LMGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LMGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
LMGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FKDNX

FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMGNX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.44	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	1.95	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.25	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	1.43	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	4.46	-0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGNX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMGNX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	1.44	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.41	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.74	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.67	-0.35

Drawdowns

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGNX drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than FKDNX's maximum drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGNX and FKDNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMGNX	FKDNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.13%	-51.63%	-19.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.62%	-20.49%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.43%	-26.23%	+11.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	-48.28%	+13.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.96%	-48.28%	+13.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-1.14%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.46%	-11.25%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	6.57%	-2.83%

Volatility

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) at 4.99%. This indicates that LMGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMGNX	FKDNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	4.99%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.81%	15.86%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.64%	20.41%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.72%	26.20%	-8.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.36%	24.61%	-7.25%

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMGNX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

LMGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than FKDNX's 9.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	9.95%	11.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.74%	2.92%	1.77%	3.55%	2.46%
LMGNX ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I	6.92%	7.33%	1.38%	1.28%	0.81%	2.28%	0.16%	0.31%	0.24%	0.21%	0.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMGNX and FKDNX in my portfolio?

LMGNX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMGNX or FKDNX?

LMGNX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to FKDNX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGNX dropped -71.13% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.