LMGNX vs. FIVFX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX).

LMGNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 17, 1995. FIVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1994.

Performance

LMGNX vs. FIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LMGNX vs. FIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMGNX ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I	-4.06%	23.05%	7.48%	14.30%	-21.16%	3.99%	24.92%	31.43%	-9.37%	36.41%
FIVFX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	0.00%	19.54%	8.05%	27.58%	-26.48%	12.14%	22.32%	33.05%	-12.87%	35.81%

Returns By Period

LMGNX

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -8.09%
• YTD: -4.06%
• 6M: -3.93%
• 1Y: 12.42%
• 3Y*: 9.53%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 9.33%

FIVFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGNX vs. FIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FIVFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

FIVFX

Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund

LMGNX

ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I

Return for Risk

LMGNX vs. FIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGNX

LMGNX Risk / Return Rank: 26
LMGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LMGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
LMGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
LMGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LMGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGNX vs. FIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMGNX	FIVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMGNX	FIVFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between LMGNX and FIVFX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LMGNX vs. FIVFX - Dividend Comparison

LMGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, less than FIVFX's 10.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMGNX ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I	7.64%	7.33%	1.38%	1.28%	0.81%	2.28%	0.16%	0.31%	0.24%	0.21%	0.56%	0.00%
FIVFX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	10.67%	10.67%	4.19%	0.38%	0.05%	9.08%	1.28%	3.29%	3.00%	2.99%	0.68%	1.57%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LMGNX	FIVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.45%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.55%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LMGNX	FIVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.21%	—	—