PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VATE vs. POWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VATE vs. POWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VATE achieves a 301.55% return, which is significantly higher than POWL's 174.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VATE has underperformed POWL with an annualized return of -3.63%, while POWL has yielded a comparatively higher 40.77% annualized return.


VATE

1D
-0.27%
1M
38.55%
YTD
301.55%
6M
261.55%
1Y
246.37%
3Y*
1.22%
5Y*
-15.29%
10Y*
-3.63%

POWL

1D
-5.30%
1M
4.40%
YTD
174.55%
6M
158.45%
1Y
385.75%
3Y*
146.77%
5Y*
96.55%
10Y*
40.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VATE vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VATE
INNOVATE Corp.
301.55%-8.50%-59.84%-34.22%-49.46%13.50%50.23%-17.80%-55.63%63.41%
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
174.55%44.49%152.21%155.62%24.34%3.60%-37.60%101.58%-9.92%-24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VATE and POWL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2009

0.19

The correlation between VATE and POWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VATE:

$242.21M

POWL:

$10.65B

EPS

VATE:

-$4.02

POWL:

$5.12

PS Ratio

VATE:

0.18

POWL:

9.40

PB Ratio

VATE:

186.32

POWL:

15.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

VATE:

$1.34B

POWL:

$1.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VATE:

$190.20M

POWL:

$340.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

VATE:

$5.40M

POWL:

$236.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VATE vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VATE
VATE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VATE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VATE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VATE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VATE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VATE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

POWL
POWL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
POWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
POWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VATE vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VATEPOWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.63

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.49

12.59

-5.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.51

39.72

-22.21

VATE vs. POWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VATE Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is lower than the POWL Sharpe Ratio of 6.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VATE and POWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VATE vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VATE drawdown since its inception was -95.92%, which is greater than POWL's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VATE and POWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VATEPOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.92%

-73.10%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.11%

-30.88%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.92%

-55.76%

-27.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.99%

-55.76%

-37.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.36%

-68.85%

-26.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.42%

-9.45%

-67.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.17%

-36.07%

-10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.14%

9.77%

+4.37%

Volatility

VATE vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison

INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) has a higher volatility of 32.32% compared to Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) at 18.68%. This indicates that VATE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VATEPOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.32%

18.68%

+13.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.59%

44.31%

+18.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.45%

59.66%

+23.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.30%

64.44%

+29.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.38%

54.90%

+27.48%

Dividends

VATE vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison

VATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.12%0.34%0.48%1.19%2.96%3.53%3.53%2.12%4.16%3.63%2.67%4.00%
VATE
INNOVATE Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%43.53%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VATE vs. POWL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between INNOVATE Corp. and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00M20222023202420252026
364.80M
296.62M
(VATE) Total Revenue
(POWL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VATE vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between INNOVATE Corp. and Powell Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
14.7%
29.7%
Portfolio components
VATE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, INNOVATE Corp. reported a gross profit of 53.50M and revenue of 364.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.7%.

POWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

VATE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, INNOVATE Corp. reported an operating income of -100.00K and revenue of 364.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.0%.

POWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

VATE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, INNOVATE Corp. reported a net income of -17.20M and revenue of 364.80M, resulting in a net margin of -4.7%.

POWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VATE and POWL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VATE has higher volatility (32.32%) compared to POWL (18.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VATE dropped -95.92% vs POWL's -73.10%.

POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.52 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VATE and POWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer