PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMB vs. AM.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMB vs. AM.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LMB is traded in USD, while AM.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AM.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than AM.PA's 8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed AM.PA with an annualized return of 22.55%, while AM.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 19.50% annualized return.


LMB

1D
-2.80%
1M
10.25%
YTD
1.59%
6M
4.13%
1Y
-44.24%
3Y*
50.98%
5Y*
52.40%
10Y*
22.55%

AM.PA

1D
-1.17%
1M
5.41%
YTD
8.65%
6M
9.34%
1Y
-1.01%
3Y*
24.94%
5Y*
24.44%
10Y*
19.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMB vs. AM.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
1.59%-8.99%88.12%336.79%15.67%-27.01%226.19%2.72%-73.39%-1.91%
AM.PA
Dassault Aviation SA
8.65%59.93%4.93%18.88%59.08%12.93%-16.55%14.16%-2.09%53.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LMB and AM.PA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2016

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMB vs. AM.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMB
LMB Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMB Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AM.PA
AM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMB vs. AM.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMBAM.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.02

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.05

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-0.10

-1.04

LMB vs. AM.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the AM.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMB and AM.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMB vs. AM.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, which is greater than AM.PA's maximum drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and AM.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMBAM.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.10%

-58.61%

-25.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.92%

-21.79%

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.92%

-22.11%

-33.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.92%

-35.72%

-20.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.10%

-58.61%

-25.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.11%

-16.08%

-31.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-13.76%

-17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.98%

10.52%

+28.46%

Volatility

LMB vs. AM.PA - Volatility Comparison

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 18.28% compared to Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA) at 8.30%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AM.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMBAM.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.28%

8.30%

+9.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.99%

25.12%

+31.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.31%

31.78%

+34.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.70%

30.48%

+32.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.28%

31.03%

+32.25%

Dividends

LMB vs. AM.PA - Dividend Comparison

LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AM.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AM.PA
Dassault Aviation SA
1.61%1.72%1.71%1.67%1.57%12.95%0.00%18.12%12.64%9.32%11.40%8.72%
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LMB vs. AM.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Dassault Aviation SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LMB values in USD, AM.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


LMB and AM.PA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMB and AM.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer