LMAT vs. KNSL
LMAT (LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.) and KNSL (Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.) are both stocks. LMAT operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while KNSL operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, LMAT returned 13.37%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for KNSL. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMAT vs. KNSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMAT achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than KNSL's -24.36% return.
LMAT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -18.02%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 21.12%
KNSL
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -24.36%
- 6M
- -21.27%
- 1Y
- -37.42%
- 3Y*
- -4.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- —
LMAT vs. KNSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMAT LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. | 13.51% | -10.95% | 63.63% | 24.60% | -7.40% | 25.10% | 14.09% | 53.77% | -25.13% | 26.58% |
KNSL Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. | -24.36% | -15.78% | 39.06% | 28.27% | 10.17% | 19.16% | 97.28% | 83.67% | 24.09% | 33.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMAT and KNSL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.25 |
The correlation between LMAT and KNSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LMAT:
$2.68
KNSL:
$30.23
LMAT:
34.24
KNSL:
9.77
LMAT:
1.47
KNSL:
0.26
LMAT:
8.34
KNSL:
2.69
LMAT:
$256.28M
KNSL:
$1.92B
LMAT:
$185.52M
KNSL:
$707.86M
LMAT:
$90.48M
KNSL:
$535.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMAT vs. KNSL — Risk / Return Rank
LMAT
KNSL
LMAT vs. KNSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (KNSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMAT | KNSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | -1.18 | +1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | -1.71 | +2.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.80 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | -0.94 | +1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | -1.81 | +3.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMAT | KNSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | -1.18 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.35 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.87 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
LMAT vs. KNSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMAT drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than KNSL's maximum drawdown of -45.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMAT and KNSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMAT | KNSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -45.87% | -29.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.93% | -39.56% | +17.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.32% | -45.87% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.93% | -45.87% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.76% | -45.87% | +24.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -11.83% | -7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.56% | 20.56% | -10.00% |
Volatility
LMAT vs. KNSL - Volatility Comparison
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (KNSL) at 8.32%. This indicates that LMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMAT | KNSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 8.32% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.18% | 23.60% | +5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.61% | 31.91% | +4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.40% | 38.41% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.47% | 38.21% | +3.26% |
Dividends
LMAT vs. KNSL - Dividend Comparison
LMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than KNSL's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNSL Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. | 0.28% | 0.17% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.20% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
LMAT LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. | 0.98% | 1.23% | 0.69% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 0.88% | 0.94% | 0.95% | 1.18% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.93% |
Financials
LMAT vs. KNSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. and Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMAT vs. KNSL - Profitability Comparison
LMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.40M and revenue of 66.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.
KNSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 466.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.78M and revenue of 66.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.
KNSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 466.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a net income of 15.68M and revenue of 66.55M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
KNSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. reported a net income of 112.55M and revenue of 466.71M, resulting in a net margin of 24.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMAT and KNSL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMAT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to KNSL (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMAT dropped -75.69% vs KNSL's -45.87%.
LMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMAT and KNSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer