LMAT vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LMAT or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between LMAT and VOO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LMAT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LMAT:
1.96
VOO:
1.94
LMAT:
2.84
VOO:
2.60
LMAT:
1.36
VOO:
1.35
LMAT:
4.11
VOO:
2.92
LMAT:
10.71
VOO:
12.23
LMAT:
6.26%
VOO:
2.02%
LMAT:
34.26%
VOO:
12.74%
LMAT:
-75.69%
VOO:
-33.99%
LMAT:
-9.73%
VOO:
-1.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMAT achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LMAT has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 30.36%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.41% annualized return.
LMAT
5.77%
6.24%
19.43%
69.20%
23.11%
30.36%
VOO
2.70%
1.64%
16.03%
23.86%
14.34%
13.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LMAT vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LMAT
VOO
LMAT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LMAT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
LMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VOO's 1.21% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMAT LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. | 0.66% | 0.69% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 0.88% | 0.94% | 0.95% | 1.18% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.93% | 1.83% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
LMAT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMAT drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMAT and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LMAT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.01%. This indicates that LMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.