LMAT vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LMAT or VOO.
Key characteristics
| LMAT | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.98% | 7.68% |
| 1Y Return | 23.87% | 24.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.18% | 8.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.07% | 13.73% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 24.78% | 12.60% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.63 | 2.21 |
| Daily Std Dev | 38.94% | 11.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.69% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.56% | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMAT and VOO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LMAT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LMAT achieves a 16.98% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, LMAT has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 24.78%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.60% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LMAT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LMAT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
LMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VOO's 1.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMAT LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 0.88% | 0.94% | 0.95% | 1.18% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.93% | 1.83% | 1.50% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.37% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
LMAT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMAT drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMAT and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LMAT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.63%. This indicates that LMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.