PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMAT vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMAT vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMAT achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, LMAT has outperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 21.54%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.80% annualized return.


LMAT

1D
3.77%
1M
-5.93%
YTD
13.92%
6M
10.03%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
21.54%

FXAIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.79%
6M
8.79%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMAT vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMAT
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
13.92%-10.95%63.63%24.60%-7.40%25.10%14.09%53.77%-25.13%26.58%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
9.79%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LMAT and FXAIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.33

The correlation between LMAT and FXAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMAT vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMAT
LMAT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMAT vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMATFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.39

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

3.02

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

13.62

-12.65

LMAT vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMAT and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMAT vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMAT drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMAT and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMATFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-33.79%

-41.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.33%

-8.89%

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.32%

-18.76%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.93%

-24.50%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.65%

-33.79%

-13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.48%

-1.72%

-19.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-3.79%

-15.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.63%

1.97%

+9.66%

Volatility

LMAT vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 4.68%. This indicates that LMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMATFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

4.68%

+5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.31%

9.84%

+20.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.36%

12.50%

+24.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.50%

17.00%

+19.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.51%

18.12%

+23.39%

Dividends

LMAT vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

LMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FXAIX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
LMAT
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
0.98%1.23%0.69%0.99%1.09%0.88%0.94%0.95%1.18%0.69%0.71%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMAT and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMAT has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to FXAIX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMAT dropped -75.69% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMAT and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer