LMAT vs. COO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO).

Performance

LMAT vs. COO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LMAT vs. COO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMAT LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.	34.92%	-10.95%	63.63%	24.60%	-7.40%	25.10%	14.09%	53.77%	-25.13%	26.58%
COO The Cooper Companies, Inc.	-12.76%	-10.85%	-2.83%	14.47%	-21.06%	15.33%	13.10%	26.27%	16.84%	24.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LMAT : $2.51B COO : $14.06B
EPS LMAT : $2.47 COO : $2.02
PE Ratio LMAT : 44.28 COO : 35.45
PS Ratio LMAT : 10.24 COO : 3.43
PB Ratio LMAT : 6.37 COO : 1.68
Total Revenue (TTM) LMAT : $249.60M COO : $4.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) LMAT : $178.54M COO : $2.67B
EBITDA (TTM) LMAT : $85.42M COO : $962.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMAT achieves a 34.92% return, which is significantly higher than COO's -12.76% return. Over the past 10 years, LMAT has outperformed COO with an annualized return of 22.62%, while COO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.16% annualized return.

LMAT

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 34.92%
• 6M: 25.33%
• 1Y: 31.31%
• 3Y*: 29.74%
• 5Y*: 18.74%
• 10Y*: 22.62%

COO

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -14.55%
• YTD: -12.76%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: -15.23%
• 3Y*: -8.50%
• 5Y*: -5.79%
• 10Y*: 6.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LMAT vs. COO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMAT

LMAT Risk / Return Rank: 70
LMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
LMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

COO

COO Risk / Return Rank: 21
COO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
COO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
COO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
COO Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
COO Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMAT vs. COO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMAT	COO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	-0.44	+1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	-0.38	+1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.95	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	-0.61	+2.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	-1.16	+4.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMAT vs. COO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the COO Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMAT and COO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMAT	COO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	-0.44	+1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	-0.20	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.22	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.12	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between LMAT and COO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LMAT vs. COO - Dividend Comparison

LMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while COO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMAT LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.	0.78%	1.23%	0.69%	0.99%	1.09%	0.88%	0.94%	0.95%	1.18%	0.69%	0.71%	0.93%
COO The Cooper Companies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.04%

Drawdowns

LMAT vs. COO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMAT drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum COO drawdown of -98.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMAT and COO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMAT	COO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.69%	-98.88%	+23.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.91%	-23.83%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.93%	-45.45%	+7.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.65%	-45.45%	-2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.75%	-37.25%	+33.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.04%	-40.55%	+21.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.01%	12.66%	-1.65%

Volatility

LMAT vs. COO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) is 7.72%, while The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that LMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMAT	COO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.72%	8.16%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.47%	18.98%	+8.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.28%	35.02%	+4.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.27%	28.68%	+7.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.51%	27.61%	+13.90%

Financials

LMAT vs. COO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. and The Cooper Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.19M and revenue of 64.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

COO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Cooper Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 695.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

LMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.83M and revenue of 64.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.2%.

COO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Cooper Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 212.80M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

LMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a net income of 15.58M and revenue of 64.45M, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.

COO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Cooper Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 130.80M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.