LITP vs. SLVR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and SLVR (Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LITP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SLVR is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LITP returned 218.79% vs 118.11% for SLVR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

LITP vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a 28.96% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR's 6.80% return.

LITP

• 1D: -4.66%
• 1M: -7.17%
• YTD: 28.96%
• 6M: 41.58%
• 1Y: 218.79%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLVR

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 6M: 18.93%
• 1Y: 118.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITP vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	28.96%	77.87%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	6.80%	170.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and SLVR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

LITP vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 87
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SLVR

SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 51
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITP vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.78	1.93	+1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	2.25	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.31	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.08	3.08	+4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.48	7.66	+13.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LITP vs. SLVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is higher than the SLVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and SLVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78	1.93	+1.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	2.02	-2.08

Drawdowns

LITP vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, which is greater than SLVR's maximum drawdown of -38.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and SLVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.72%	-38.60%	-36.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.12%	-38.60%	+7.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-74.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.47%	-28.51%	+14.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.29%	-9.24%	-33.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.23%	15.47%	-5.24%

Volatility

LITP vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is 13.36%, while Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a volatility of 19.31%. This indicates that LITP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.36%	19.31%	-5.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.69%	51.02%	-11.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.34%	61.64%	-3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.34%	57.85%	-10.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.34%	57.85%	-10.51%

LITP vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LITP and SLVR have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

LITP vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than SLVR's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	5.74%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	3.45%	3.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LITP and SLVR in my portfolio?

LITP and SLVR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LITP or SLVR?

SLVR has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to LITP (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.72% vs SLVR's -38.60%.

Which ETF is better, LITP or SLVR?

On 1-year performance, LITP leads with 218.79% vs 118.11% for SLVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, LITP has been the lower-risk option at 13.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LITP or SLVR?

Over the 1-year period, LITP has performed better with a 218.79% return vs 118.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LITP or SLVR?

LITP and SLVR have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LITP or SLVR?

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 3.45% for SLVR.

What is the main difference between LITP and SLVR?

LITP is categorized as Energy Equities, while SLVR is Silver. LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.