LITP vs. SLVR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR).

LITP and SLVR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LITP is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. SLVR is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2025. Both LITP and SLVR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LITP vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LITP vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	10.13%	77.87%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	6.06%	170.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR's 6.06% return.

LITP

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 58.57%
• 1Y: 140.65%
• 3Y*: -2.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLVR

• 1D: 8.91%
• 1M: -29.01%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 156.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITP vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LITP and SLVR have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

SLVR

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF

Return for Risk

LITP vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 92
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

SLVR

SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 93
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITP vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.57	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.67	+0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	4.00	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.52	13.77	-1.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LITP vs. SLVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SLVR Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and SLVR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.57	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	2.42	-2.59

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and SLVR is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LITP vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than SLVR's 3.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	6.73%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	3.47%	3.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LITP vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, which is greater than SLVR's maximum drawdown of -38.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and SLVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.72%	-38.60%	-36.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.12%	-38.60%	+7.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.14%	-29.01%	+5.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-6.83%	-37.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.37%	11.21%	-0.84%

Volatility

LITP vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is 18.81%, while Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a volatility of 23.19%. This indicates that LITP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LITP	SLVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.81%	23.19%	-4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.10%	53.62%	-9.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.79%	61.25%	-2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.29%	58.32%	-11.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.29%	58.32%	-11.03%