LITP vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LITP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LITP returned 165.49% vs 4.56% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. LITP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

LITP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.63% return.

LITP

• 1D: -9.58%
• 1M: -24.71%
• YTD: 13.53%
• 6M: 26.16%
• 1Y: 165.49%
• 3Y*: -4.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 2.66%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	13.53%	106.71%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.63%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and RBIL is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

LITP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 79
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 83

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LITP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	5.00	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	7.91	-4.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.38	-1.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.35	16.96	-11.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.98	70.30	-54.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LITP vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LITP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	5.00	-2.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	4.20	-4.34

Drawdowns

LITP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITP	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.72%	-0.50%	-74.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.12%	-0.27%	-30.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-74.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.71%	-0.07%	-24.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.23%	-0.06%	-42.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.40%	0.06%	+10.34%

Volatility

LITP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.26%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LITP	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.29%	0.26%	+14.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.07%	0.80%	+40.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.18%	0.92%	+58.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.60%	1.05%	+46.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.60%	1.05%	+46.55%

LITP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

LITP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	6.53%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LITP and RBIL in my portfolio?

LITP and RBIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LITP or RBIL?

LITP has higher volatility (14.29%) compared to RBIL (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.72% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, LITP or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, LITP leads with 165.49% vs 4.56% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LITP or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, LITP has performed better with a 165.49% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LITP or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LITP or RBIL?

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between LITP and RBIL?

LITP is categorized as Energy Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.