LIT vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.
Performance
LIT vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LIT vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 14.63% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 3.27% | -28.63% | 64.19% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 17.65% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LIT has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of 14.87%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.45% annualized return.
LIT
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 92.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
SQM
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 88.65%
- 1Y
- 104.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIT vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
LIT
SQM
LIT vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 2.04 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 2.61 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 4.06 | +0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.45 | 9.94 | +9.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.04 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.26 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.42 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between LIT and SQM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LIT vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than SQM's 0.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.42% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
LIT vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and SQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.91% | -78.34% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.61% | -25.02% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.91% | -69.76% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.91% | -72.98% | +7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -18.36% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -30.43% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 10.22% | -5.59% |
Volatility
LIT vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is 11.99%, while Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a volatility of 17.99%. This indicates that LIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.99% | 17.99% | -6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.73% | 36.57% | -11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.57% | 51.41% | -16.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 49.55% | -17.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 45.99% | -15.49% |