LIT vs. ISCMF
LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LIT returned 10.70%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. LIT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
LIT vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 27.30% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
LIT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- 27.30%
- 6M
- 26.02%
- 1Y
- 129.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIT vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 27.30% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -18.15% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIT and ISCMF is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | -0.03 |
The correlation between LIT and ISCMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIT vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
LIT
ISCMF
LIT vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIT | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 2.31 | -0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.90 | 5.53 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.08 | 11.95 | +16.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIT vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIT | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.91% | -25.42% | -40.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -5.69% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.01% | -7.62% | -45.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | -5.26% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.56% | -13.36% | -20.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 2.63% | +1.99% |
Volatility
LIT vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 5.11%. This indicates that LIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIT | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 5.11% | +5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.79% | 15.45% | +8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.94% | 17.87% | +16.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 14.29% | +17.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 14.29% | +16.49% |
LIT vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIT vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.38% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIT and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIT has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIT dropped -65.91% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 10.70% for LIT. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.
LIT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
LIT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while ISCMF is Commodities. LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LIT and 0.19% for ISCMF.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIT and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer