LIRKX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
LIRKX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Custom Benchmark (USD). It was launched on May 31, 2011. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
LIRKX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LIRKX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIRKX BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund | -0.94% | 12.48% | 6.08% | 11.48% | -15.21% | 6.75% | 11.46% | 15.90% | -3.50% | 10.75% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIRKX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LIRKX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 5.48%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
LIRKX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 9.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LIRKX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIRKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LIRKX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
LIRKX
FASGX
LIRKX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIRKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.21 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 1.73 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.55 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 6.89 | +1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIRKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.21 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.70 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.60 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between LIRKX and FASGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LIRKX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
LIRKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIRKX BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund | 3.93% | 3.89% | 2.06% | 2.67% | 2.75% | 2.74% | 1.98% | 2.48% | 2.50% | 2.28% | 2.53% | 2.98% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
LIRKX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIRKX drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIRKX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIRKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.46% | -47.35% | +26.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.27% | -9.07% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.46% | -23.54% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.46% | -27.20% | +6.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -7.95% | +3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -6.74% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 2.04% | -0.90% |
Volatility
LIRKX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) is 2.48%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that LIRKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LIRKX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 4.57% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | 7.78% | -3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.03% | 12.82% | -5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.78% | 12.14% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 12.56% | -5.09% |