PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIRAX vs. FFFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares (LIRAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIRAX achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 5.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LIRAX having a 5.70% annualized return and FFFCX not far ahead at 5.84%.


LIRAX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.21%
YTD
5.70%
6M
5.87%
1Y
14.33%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
5.70%

FFFCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIRAX
BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares
5.70%12.09%5.84%11.22%-15.49%6.42%11.05%15.60%-3.79%10.43%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.33%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LIRAX and FFFCX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.94

The correlation between LIRAX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIRAX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIRAX
LIRAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LIRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LIRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares (LIRAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIRAXFFFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.53

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.20

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

13.95

+1.07

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIRAX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIRAXFFFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.59

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.58

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.93

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.68

+0.07

Drawdowns

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIRAX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIRAX and FFFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIRAXFFFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-36.88%

+16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-4.00%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

-5.83%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-18.35%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.67%

-18.35%

-2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.94%

-4.57%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.92%

+0.04%

Volatility

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares (LIRAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) have volatilities of 1.98% and 2.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIRAXFFFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

2.02%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

4.15%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.55%

4.95%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

6.38%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

6.30%

+1.20%

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIRAX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIRAX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

LIRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.66%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
LIRAX
BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares
3.34%3.53%1.82%2.37%2.42%2.42%1.70%2.22%2.18%1.99%2.23%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, LIRAX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFCX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to LIRAX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIRAX dropped -20.67% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

LIRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIRAX and FFFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer