PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIRAX vs. FMIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares (LIRAX) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIRAX achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than FMIL's 10.26% return.


LIRAX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.21%
YTD
5.70%
6M
5.87%
1Y
14.33%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
5.70%

FMIL

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.15%
YTD
10.26%
6M
11.18%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LIRAX
BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares
5.70%12.09%5.84%11.22%-15.49%6.42%10.16%
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
10.26%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%18.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LIRAX and FMIL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.74

The correlation between LIRAX and FMIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIRAX vs. FMIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIRAX
LIRAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LIRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LIRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FMIL
FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares (LIRAX) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIRAXFMILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.61

2.12

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

2.90

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.38

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.71

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.02

12.30

+2.72

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the FMIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIRAX and FMIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIRAXFMILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.12

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.94

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.17

-0.41

Drawdowns

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIRAX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FMIL drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIRAX and FMIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIRAXFMILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-19.72%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-9.98%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

-19.72%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-19.72%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.68%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.94%

-2.99%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

2.20%

-1.24%

Volatility

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares (LIRAX) is 1.98%, while Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that LIRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIRAXFMILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.15%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

9.73%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.55%

12.80%

-7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

16.92%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

17.65%

-10.15%

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIRAX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIRAX vs. FMIL - Dividend Comparison

LIRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than FMIL's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
1.00%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIRAX
BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund Investor A Shares
3.34%3.53%1.82%2.37%2.42%2.42%1.70%2.22%2.18%1.99%2.23%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIRAX and FMIL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMIL has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to LIRAX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIRAX dropped -20.67% vs FMIL's -19.72%.

LIRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIRAX and FMIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer