LINT vs. USL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - LINT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. LINT is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.

Performance

LINT vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 562.84% return, which is significantly higher than USL's 63.07% return.

LINT

• 1D: 9.00%
• 1M: 30.35%
• YTD: 562.84%
• 6M: 362.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USL

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: 63.07%
• 6M: 59.66%
• 1Y: 57.86%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 17.41%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	562.84%	5.79%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	63.07%	-2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and USL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	-0.15

LINT vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LINT	USL
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	4.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LINT vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USL

USL Risk / Return Rank: 56
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LINT	USL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	24.05	0.01	+24.04

Drawdowns

LINT vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and USL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINT	USL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.54%	-89.06%	+39.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.76%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.55%	-38.16%	+11.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.51%	-61.46%	+40.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LINT	USL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	163.04%	28.54%	+134.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	163.04%	30.08%	+132.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	163.04%	32.35%	+130.69%

LINT vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

LINT vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.13%	0.25%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINT and USL in my portfolio?

LINT and USL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LINT or USL?

On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LINT or USL?

USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LINT or USL?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

What is the main difference between LINT and USL?

LINT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.88% for USL.