LINT vs. NRGU

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LINT is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

LINT vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 347.15% return, which is significantly higher than NRGU's 136.46% return.

LINT

• 1D: 22.09%
• 1M: -34.82%
• 6M: 182.15%
• YTD: 347.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 39.09%
• 6M: 68.44%
• YTD: 136.46%
• 1Y: 141.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 41.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$20.13M	$20.02M	$34.55M
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	$4.54M	$4.18M	$3.82M

LINT vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	347.15%	5.81%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	136.46%	-14.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and NRGU is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.06

LINT vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LINT	NRGU
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LINT vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 64
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LINT vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LINT	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.84	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.26	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.24	—

Drawdowns

LINT vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINT	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.02%	-57.50%	-11.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-43.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.88%	-18.45%	-35.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.24%	-25.70%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LINT	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	24.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	64.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	170.36%	77.29%	+93.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	170.36%	88.44%	+81.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	170.36%	88.44%	+81.92%

LINT vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LINT vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.61%	0.25%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINT and NRGU in my portfolio?

LINT and NRGU have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LINT or NRGU?

On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LINT or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LINT or NRGU?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between LINT and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.95% for NRGU.