LINT vs. ENFR
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LINT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. LINT is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Their -0.14 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
LINT vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 348.80% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 25.09% return.
LINT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -36.81%
- 6M
- 190.09%
- YTD
- 348.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 25.09%
- 1Y
- 25.93%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.57M | $4.08M | $3.12M | |
| $20.84M | $19.76M | $34.13M |
LINT vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 348.80% | 5.81% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.09% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and ENFR is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR
LINT vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINT | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINT vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.02% | -68.28% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.71% | -4.98% | -48.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.41% | -15.82% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.88% | 15.29% | +154.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.88% | 19.19% | +150.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.88% | 24.65% | +145.23% |
LINT vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than ENFR's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.01% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.61% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and ENFR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.61% for LINT.
LINT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.35% for ENFR.
Find the right allocation for LINT and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer