PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINE vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINE vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINE achieves a 29.07% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 19.63% return.


LINE

1D
-0.34%
1M
15.53%
YTD
29.07%
6M
24.54%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-0.16%
1M
7.94%
YTD
19.63%
6M
15.68%
1Y
18.53%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINE vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LINE
Lineage, Inc.
29.07%-37.20%-27.57%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
19.63%13.06%15.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LINE and CIBR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINE vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINE
LINE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINE vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LINECIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.14

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

0.79

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

1.86

-1.62

LINE vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINE Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINE and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LINE vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINE drawdown since its inception was -61.74%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINE and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINECIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.74%

-33.89%

-27.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.46%

-21.99%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.65%

-9.53%

-36.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-8.66%

-32.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.15%

9.38%

+5.77%

Volatility

LINE vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lineage, Inc. (LINE) is 10.80%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that LINE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINECIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.80%

12.35%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.50%

21.72%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.90%

25.16%

+12.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.74%

25.04%

+11.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.74%

23.65%

+13.09%

Dividends

LINE vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

LINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than CIBR's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.48%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
LINE
Lineage, Inc.
4.76%6.03%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LINE and CIBR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to LINE (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINE dropped -61.74% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINE and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer