LII vs. VRT
LII (Lennox International Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — LII in Specialty Industrial Machinery, VRT in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, LII returned 10.02%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LII vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LII achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.
LII
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- -6.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.40%
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
LII vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LII Lennox International Inc. | 6.05% | -19.54% | 37.27% | 89.55% | -24.94% | 19.71% | 13.79% | 12.78% | 3.12% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LII and VRT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.36 |
The correlation between LII and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LII:
$17.97B
VRT:
$117.86B
LII:
$22.20
VRT:
$3.99
LII:
23.13
VRT:
75.41
LII:
1.41
VRT:
0.33
LII:
3.44
VRT:
10.84
LII:
14.80
VRT:
27.77
LII:
$5.26B
VRT:
$10.84B
LII:
$1.74B
VRT:
$3.92B
LII:
$1.10B
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LII vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
LII
VRT
LII vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LII | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 6.53 | -6.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 18.20 | -18.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LII | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 2.79 | -2.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.03 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.00 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
LII vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LII drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LII and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LII | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.76% | -71.24% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.77% | -24.78% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | -61.28% | +26.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.88% | -71.24% | +24.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.22% | -20.11% | -3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -16.22% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.72% | 8.89% | +11.83% |
Volatility
LII vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lennox International Inc. (LII) is 9.20%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that LII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LII | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.20% | 16.60% | -7.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.88% | 45.55% | -19.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.85% | 58.11% | -23.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.05% | 61.81% | -29.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.27% | 54.61% | -25.34% |
Dividends
LII vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LII Lennox International Inc. | 1.01% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.97% | 1.71% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.94% | 1.08% | 1.10% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LII vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennox International Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LII vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
LII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
LII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
LII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LII and VRT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to LII (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LII dropped -62.76% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LII and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer