PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LII vs. PSN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LII vs. PSN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Parsons Corporation (PSN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LII achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than PSN's -8.25% return.


LII

1D
-0.94%
1M
2.43%
YTD
5.78%
6M
1.83%
1Y
-3.83%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
15.59%

PSN

1D
-1.01%
1M
12.54%
YTD
-8.25%
6M
-10.47%
1Y
-18.70%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LII vs. PSN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LII
Lennox International Inc.
5.78%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%19.71%13.79%-7.35%
PSN
Parsons Corporation
-8.25%-33.01%47.11%35.59%37.44%-7.58%-11.80%34.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LII and PSN is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.33

Fundamentals

EPS

LII:

$22.20

PSN:

$2.78

PE Ratio

LII:

23.07

PSN:

20.37

PEG Ratio

LII:

1.40

PSN:

0.50

PS Ratio

LII:

3.44

PSN:

0.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

LII:

$5.26B

PSN:

$6.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LII:

$1.74B

PSN:

$1.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

LII:

$1.10B

PSN:

$507.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LII vs. PSN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PSN
PSN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSN Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSN Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LII vs. PSN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Parsons Corporation (PSN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIIPSNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.95

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

-0.43

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

-0.80

+0.51

LII vs. PSN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LII Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the PSN Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LII and PSN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LII vs. PSN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LII drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, which is greater than PSN's maximum drawdown of -56.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LII and PSN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIIPSNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.76%

-56.99%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.77%

-45.41%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-56.99%

+22.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.88%

-56.99%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.42%

-49.96%

+26.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-16.74%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.90%

24.34%

-3.44%

Volatility

LII vs. PSN - Volatility Comparison

Lennox International Inc. (LII) has a higher volatility of 10.80% compared to Parsons Corporation (PSN) at 9.96%. This indicates that LII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIIPSNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.80%

9.96%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.49%

31.10%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.30%

43.12%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.15%

33.39%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.31%

34.96%

-5.65%

Dividends

LII vs. PSN - Dividend Comparison

LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while PSN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.02%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%
PSN
Parsons Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LII vs. PSN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennox International Inc. and Parsons Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.14B
1.49B
(LII) Total Revenue
(PSN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LII vs. PSN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennox International Inc. and Parsons Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
31.0%
0
Portfolio components
LII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

PSN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

PSN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported an operating income of 95.67M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

LII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

PSN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a net income of 52.93M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LII and PSN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LII has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to PSN (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LII dropped -62.76% vs PSN's -56.99%.

LII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LII and PSN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer