PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIFT vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIFT vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFT achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than TLTX's 1.95% return.


LIFT

1D
0.03%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
0.82%
1M
2.89%
YTD
1.95%
6M
1.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFT vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LIFT and TLTX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIFT vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LIFT vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIFT vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFT drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFT and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIFTTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-6.35%

+5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-1.82%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-2.29%

+2.20%

Volatility

LIFT vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIFTTLTXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27%

9.28%

-8.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.27%

9.28%

-8.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.27%

9.28%

-8.01%

LIFT vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIFT vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

LIFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.03%, more than TLTX's 17.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LIFT and TLTX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LIFT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LIFT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 31.03%, compared with 17.11% for TLTX.

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIFT and 0.29% for TLTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIFT and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer