LIFT vs. LFDR
LIFT (LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF) and LFDR (LifeX Durable Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from Stone Ridge. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
LIFT vs. LFDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFT achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than LFDR's -0.39% return.
LIFT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFDR
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- -1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIFT vs. LFDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 0.72% | 1.16% |
LFDR LifeX Durable Income ETF | -0.39% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFT and LFDR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFT vs. LFDR — Risk / Return Rank
LIFT
LFDR
LIFT vs. LFDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and LifeX Durable Income ETF (LFDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIFT | LFDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.19 | +2.05 |
Drawdowns
LIFT vs. LFDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFT drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum LFDR drawdown of -7.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFT and LFDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFT | LFDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -7.77% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -4.12% | +4.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -2.95% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.57% | — |
Volatility
LIFT vs. LFDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFT | LFDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 8.37% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 9.61% | -8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 9.61% | -8.37% |
LIFT vs. LFDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LIFT and LFDR have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIFT vs. LFDR - Dividend Comparison
LIFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.05%, more than LFDR's 8.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LFDR LifeX Durable Income ETF | 8.27% | 13.10% |
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 31.05% | 8.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFT and LFDR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LIFT and LFDR have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 31.05%, compared with 8.27% for LFDR.
Find the right allocation for LIFT and LFDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer