LIFT vs. LFAI
LIFT (LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF) and LFAI (LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from Stone Ridge. Both are actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
LIFT vs. LFAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFT achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than LFAI's -2.25% return.
LIFT
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LFAI
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.88K | $4.56K | $38.61K | |
| $3.97K | $7.75K | $18.58K |
LIFT vs. LFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 1.06% | 1.16% |
LFAI LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF | -2.25% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFT and LFAI is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFT vs. LFAI — Risk / Return Rank
LIFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LFAI
LIFT vs. LFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIFT | LFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIFT vs. LFAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFT drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum LFAI drawdown of -8.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFT and LFAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFT | LFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -8.64% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -5.14% | +5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -3.51% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.31% | — |
Volatility
LIFT vs. LFAI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFT | LFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23% | 6.13% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.23% | 7.07% | -5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.23% | 7.07% | -5.84% |
LIFT vs. LFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LIFT and LFAI have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIFT vs. LFAI - Dividend Comparison
LIFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.61%, more than LFAI's 13.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFAI LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF | 13.71% | 16.48% | 1.91% |
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 35.61% | 8.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFT and LFAI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LIFT and LFAI have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 35.61%, compared with 13.71% for LFAI.
Find the right allocation for LIFT and LFAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer