LIFT vs. BCKT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIFT (LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF) and BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from Stone Ridge. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

LIFT vs. BCKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFT achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than BCKT's 0.31% return.

LIFT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 1.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCKT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFT vs. BCKT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF	0.72%	1.16%
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	0.31%	1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFT and BCKT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

LIFT vs. BCKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIFT	BCKT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.24	1.34	+0.90

Drawdowns

LIFT vs. BCKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFT drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum BCKT drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFT and BCKT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIFT	BCKT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-1.00%	+0.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.59%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.09%	-0.26%	+0.17%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LIFT	BCKT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24%	1.53%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.24%	1.53%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.24%	1.53%	-0.29%

LIFT vs. BCKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LIFT and BCKT have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LIFT vs. BCKT - Dividend Comparison

LIFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.05%, more than BCKT's 17.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	17.96%	5.36%
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF	31.05%	8.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIFT and BCKT in my portfolio?

LIFT and BCKT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LIFT or BCKT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIFT or BCKT?

LIFT and BCKT have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIFT or BCKT?

LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 31.05%, compared with 17.96% for BCKT.