LIFIX vs. EIRRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX).
LIFIX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. EIRRX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010.
Performance
LIFIX vs. EIRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LIFIX vs. EIRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund | 0.14% | 7.16% | 4.81% | 3.87% | -5.34% | 10.43% | 6.05% | 5.17% | -1.06% | 1.46% |
EIRRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund | 0.45% | 4.63% | 5.65% | 6.33% | -3.08% | 7.84% | 5.25% | 5.60% | -0.15% | 1.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFIX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than EIRRX's 0.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LIFIX having a 3.81% annualized return and EIRRX not far behind at 3.76%.
LIFIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.81%
EIRRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LIFIX vs. EIRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIFIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EIRRX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LIFIX vs. EIRRX — Risk / Return Rank
LIFIX
EIRRX
LIFIX vs. EIRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIFIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.71 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.44 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.91 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 12.86 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIFIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.71 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.35 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 1.37 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.10 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFIX and EIRRX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LIFIX vs. EIRRX - Dividend Comparison
LIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than EIRRX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund | 4.51% | 4.94% | 4.17% | 3.88% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 3.77% | 4.15% | 4.18% | 3.96% | 4.43% | 4.42% |
EIRRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund | 4.11% | 3.57% | 4.08% | 4.50% | 5.07% | 3.54% | 2.21% | 2.66% | 2.91% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
LIFIX vs. EIRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFIX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, which is greater than EIRRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFIX and EIRRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -10.27% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -1.18% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.49% | -6.22% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.02% | -10.27% | -7.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.44% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -1.01% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.27% | +0.17% |
Volatility
LIFIX vs. EIRRX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) at 0.69%. This indicates that LIFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LIFIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 0.69% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.59% | 1.13% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 1.96% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 2.85% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 2.76% | +1.79% |