PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIRRX vs. CSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIRRX vs. CSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRRX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than CSL's 10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRRX has underperformed CSL with an annualized return of 3.75%, while CSL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.


EIRRX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
0.85%
6M
0.95%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
3.75%

CSL

1D
-2.24%
1M
5.72%
YTD
10.99%
6M
8.11%
1Y
-1.91%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIRRX vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
0.85%4.63%5.65%6.33%-3.08%7.84%5.25%5.60%-0.15%1.94%
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
10.99%-12.26%19.14%34.26%-4.08%60.64%-1.96%63.10%-10.31%4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRRX and CSL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIRRX vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIRRX
EIRRX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EIRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CSL
CSL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSL Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIRRX vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIRRXCSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.02

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

-0.06

+3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.69

-0.10

+12.79

EIRRX vs. CSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the CSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRRX and CSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIRRX vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRRX drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum CSL drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRRX and CSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIRRXCSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-64.56%

+54.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-31.67%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.67%

-37.72%

+36.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.22%

-37.72%

+31.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.27%

-38.68%

+28.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-25.15%

+24.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-12.32%

+11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

19.09%

-18.86%

Volatility

EIRRX vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) is 0.71%, while Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that EIRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIRRXCSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

11.95%

-11.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

26.00%

-24.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

36.94%

-35.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

30.97%

-28.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.77%

29.76%

-26.99%

Dividends

EIRRX vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison

EIRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than CSL's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
1.25%1.31%1.00%1.02%1.09%0.86%1.31%1.11%1.53%1.27%1.18%1.24%
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
4.10%3.57%4.08%4.50%5.07%3.54%2.21%2.66%2.91%2.13%2.24%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIRRX and CSL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSL has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to EIRRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRRX dropped -10.27% vs CSL's -64.56%.

EIRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIRRX and CSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer