PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIRRX vs. CMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIRRX vs. CMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRRX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than CMI's 32.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRRX has underperformed CMI with an annualized return of 3.81%, while CMI has yielded a comparatively higher 22.59% annualized return.


EIRRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.65%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
3.81%

CMI

1D
4.53%
1M
2.64%
YTD
32.64%
6M
35.01%
1Y
115.43%
3Y*
48.78%
5Y*
23.71%
10Y*
22.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIRRX vs. CMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
1.64%4.63%5.65%6.33%-3.08%7.84%5.25%5.60%-0.15%1.94%
CMI
Cummins Inc.
32.64%49.36%48.92%1.72%14.09%-1.68%30.50%38.04%-22.06%32.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRRX and CMI is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIRRX vs. CMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIRRX
EIRRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EIRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CMI
CMI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIRRX vs. CMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIRRXCMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

3.56

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.17

4.03

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.56

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

7.40

-2.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.40

27.50

-8.11

EIRRX vs. CMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the CMI Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRRX and CMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIRRXCMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

3.56

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.30

0.85

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.80

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.38

+0.74

Drawdowns

EIRRX vs. CMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRRX drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum CMI drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRRX and CMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIRRXCMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-75.66%

+65.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-15.23%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.67%

-30.48%

+28.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.22%

-30.48%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.27%

-44.05%

+33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-5.82%

+5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-22.23%

+21.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

4.09%

-3.88%

Volatility

EIRRX vs. CMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) is 0.46%, while Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a volatility of 13.59%. This indicates that EIRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIRRXCMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

13.59%

-13.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.16%

27.36%

-26.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55%

32.63%

-31.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

27.96%

-25.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.76%

28.23%

-25.47%

Dividends

EIRRX vs. CMI - Dividend Comparison

EIRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than CMI's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMI
Cummins Inc.
1.19%1.50%2.01%2.71%2.49%2.57%2.33%2.74%3.32%2.38%2.93%3.99%
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
4.07%3.57%4.08%4.50%5.07%3.54%2.21%2.66%2.91%2.13%2.24%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIRRX and CMI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMI has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to EIRRX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRRX dropped -10.27% vs CMI's -75.66%.

CMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIRRX and CMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer