LIF vs. QBTS
LIF (Life360, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LIF in Software - Application, QBTS in Computer Hardware. Over the past year, LIF returned -25.93% vs 54.05% for QBTS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -29.45% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's -10.63% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -25.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 54.05%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIF vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -29.45% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 556.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and QBTS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
LIF:
$3.88B
QBTS:
$8.59B
LIF:
$1.75
QBTS:
-$1.08
LIF:
7.30
QBTS:
637.12
LIF:
6.49
QBTS:
7.64
LIF:
$528.98M
QBTS:
$12.44M
LIF:
$407.86M
QBTS:
$8.25M
LIF:
$26.53M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
QBTS
LIF vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.16 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.67 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 1.16 | -1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -96.67% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -71.01% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -79.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.19% | -47.81% | -11.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.35% | -65.66% | +44.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.82% | 40.64% | +0.18% |
Volatility
LIF vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Life360, Inc. (LIF) is 16.67%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that LIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.67% | 42.66% | -25.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.85% | 76.89% | -24.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 108.46% | -41.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.97% | 150.99% | -88.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.97% | 150.99% | -88.02% |
Dividends
LIF vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither LIF nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LIF vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life360, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and QBTS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to LIF (16.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer