LIF vs. BSMS
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while BSMS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -26.66% vs 4.26% for BSMS. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. BSMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -27.95% return, which is significantly lower than BSMS's 0.82% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -27.95%
- 6M
- -38.40%
- 1Y
- -26.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF vs. BSMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -27.95% | 55.42% | 52.85% |
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.82% | 3.61% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and BSMS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. BSMS — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
BSMS
LIF vs. BSMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.63 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 4.08 | -4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 11.81 | -12.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 2.86 | -3.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.19 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
LIF vs. BSMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than BSMS's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and BSMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -14.95% | -50.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -1.05% | -64.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.33% | -1.09% | -57.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -4.97% | -15.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.65% | 0.36% | +39.29% |
Volatility
LIF vs. BSMS - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 19.81% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) at 0.50%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.81% | 0.50% | +19.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.75% | 0.91% | +51.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.79% | 1.50% | +65.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.14% | 3.60% | +59.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.14% | 6.21% | +56.93% |
Dividends
LIF vs. BSMS - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.61% | 0.46% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and BSMS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (19.81%) compared to BSMS (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs BSMS's -14.95%.
BSMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and BSMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer