LIF vs. BSMS
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while BSMS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -20.64% vs 3.83% for BSMS. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. BSMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -22.95% return, which is significantly lower than BSMS's 1.02% return.
LIF
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- -22.95%
- 6M
- -25.76%
- 1Y
- -20.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF vs. BSMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -22.95% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.02% | 3.61% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and BSMS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. BSMS — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
BSMS
LIF vs. BSMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.54 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.67 | -3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 10.36 | -10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. BSMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than BSMS's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and BSMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -14.95% | -50.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -1.05% | -64.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.43% | -0.90% | -54.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.84% | -4.93% | -16.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.89% | 0.37% | +41.52% |
Volatility
LIF vs. BSMS - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 19.28% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) at 0.51%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.28% | 0.51% | +18.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.33% | 1.01% | +52.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.91% | 1.52% | +66.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.05% | 3.59% | +59.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.05% | 6.18% | +56.87% |
Dividends
LIF vs. BSMS - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.61% | 0.46% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and BSMS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (19.28%) compared to BSMS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs BSMS's -14.95%.
BSMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and BSMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer