LIF vs. BSMS
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while BSMS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -21.68% vs 4.21% for BSMS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. BSMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -13.99% return, which is significantly lower than BSMS's 1.19% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 17.48%
- 6M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -13.99%
- 1Y
- -21.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 2.86%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF vs. BSMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -13.99% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.19% | 3.61% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and BSMS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. BSMS — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
BSMS
LIF vs. BSMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.62 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 4.03 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 11.48 | -11.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. BSMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than BSMS's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and BSMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -14.95% | -50.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -1.05% | -64.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.25% | -0.73% | -49.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -4.90% | -17.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.68% | 0.37% | +43.31% |
Volatility
LIF vs. BSMS - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 17.52% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) at 0.37%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.52% | 0.37% | +17.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.97% | 1.02% | +53.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.00% | 1.48% | +67.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.05% | 3.58% | +59.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.05% | 6.15% | +56.90% |
Dividends
LIF vs. BSMS - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.61% | 0.46% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and BSMS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (17.52%) compared to BSMS (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs BSMS's -14.95%.
BSMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and BSMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer