PortfoliosLab logo
BSMS vs. BSMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BSMS and BSMT is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BSMS vs. BSMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BSMS:

0.85

BSMT:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

BSMS:

0.99

BSMT:

0.58

Omega Ratio

BSMS:

1.16

BSMT:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

BSMS:

0.36

BSMT:

0.21

Martin Ratio

BSMS:

2.82

BSMT:

1.49

Ulcer Index

BSMS:

1.02%

BSMT:

1.27%

Daily Std Dev

BSMS:

3.80%

BSMT:

4.40%

Max Drawdown

BSMS:

-14.96%

BSMT:

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

BSMS:

-4.99%

BSMT:

-6.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMS achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than BSMT's -0.39% return.


BSMS

YTD

0.34%

1M

0.84%

6M

-0.44%

1Y

3.19%

3Y*

1.74%

5Y*

0.47%

10Y*

N/A

BSMT

YTD

-0.39%

1M

0.45%

6M

-1.34%

1Y

2.18%

3Y*

1.33%

5Y*

-0.03%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSMS vs. BSMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSMS and BSMT have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BSMS vs. BSMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSMS is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSMS is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSMS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSMS is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSMS is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSMS is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSMT is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSMT is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSMT is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSMT is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSMT is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSMT is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BSMS vs. BSMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BSMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the BSMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMS and BSMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BSMS vs. BSMT - Dividend Comparison

BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than BSMT's 2.89% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.84%2.81%2.58%1.56%1.49%1.76%0.46%
BSMT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF
2.89%2.80%2.62%1.65%1.31%1.82%0.48%

Drawdowns

BSMS vs. BSMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMS drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum BSMT drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMS and BSMT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BSMS vs. BSMT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) at 0.81%. This indicates that BSMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...