LIF vs. BSMR
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -24.02% vs 3.82% for BSMR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -26.82% return, which is significantly lower than BSMR's 1.25% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 16.71%
- YTD
- -26.82%
- 6M
- -30.20%
- 1Y
- -24.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -26.82% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.25% | 3.10% | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and BSMR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
BSMR
LIF vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.65 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 6.78 | -7.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 21.35 | -21.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than BSMR's maximum drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and BSMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -13.49% | -52.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -0.57% | -65.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.67% | -0.06% | -57.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -3.46% | -18.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.75% | 0.18% | +41.57% |
Volatility
LIF vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 18.78% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) at 0.42%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.78% | 0.42% | +18.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.12% | 0.97% | +52.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.71% | 1.28% | +66.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.01% | 3.02% | +59.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.01% | 5.70% | +57.31% |
Dividends
LIF vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.71% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.72% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 1.49% | 0.45% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and BSMR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (18.78%) compared to BSMR (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs BSMR's -13.49%.
BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and BSMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer