LIF vs. BSMR
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -27.35% vs 2.68% for BSMR. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LIF vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -15.73% return, which is significantly lower than BSMR's 1.20% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -15.73%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.57%
BSMR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 2.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.01M | $1.10M | $1.36M | |
| $29.00M | $30.44M | $34.94M |
LIF vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -15.73% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.20% | 3.10% | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and BSMR is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
BSMR
LIF vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.48 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 5.42 | -5.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 16.80 | -17.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than BSMR's maximum drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and BSMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -13.49% | -52.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -0.57% | -65.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.26% | -0.11% | -51.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.25% | -3.41% | -19.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.00% | 0.18% | +44.82% |
Volatility
LIF vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 16.79% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) at 0.44%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.79% | 0.44% | +16.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.79% | 0.97% | +49.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.22% | 1.31% | +68.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.18% | 3.01% | +60.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.18% | 5.66% | +57.52% |
Dividends
LIF vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.70% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.72% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 1.49% | 0.45% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and BSMR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.79%) compared to BSMR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs BSMR's -13.49%.
BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and BSMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer