PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIEN vs. BXSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIEN vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIEN achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -8.70% return.


LIEN

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.25%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
-2.27%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
10Y*

BXSL

1D
-2.06%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
-8.70%
6M
-11.93%
1Y
-17.34%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIEN vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LIEN
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc
-1.41%-3.99%58.63%-1.09%-30.00%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-8.70%-9.36%29.02%37.82%-13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LIEN and BXSL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2022

0.05

The correlation between LIEN and BXSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LIEN:

$224.10M

BXSL:

$5.40B

EPS

LIEN:

$1.50

BXSL:

$1.80

PE Ratio

LIEN:

6.55

BXSL:

12.93

PS Ratio

LIEN:

4.60

BXSL:

7.57

PB Ratio

LIEN:

0.74

BXSL:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIEN:

$48.69M

BXSL:

$706.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIEN:

$44.09M

BXSL:

$831.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

LIEN:

$35.22M

BXSL:

$525.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIEN vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIEN
LIEN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIEN vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIENBXSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

-0.87

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

-1.22

+1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.87

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

-0.74

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.19

-1.13

+2.32

LIEN vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIEN and BXSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIENBXSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

-0.87

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.29

-0.27

Drawdowns

LIEN vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIEN drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, which is greater than BXSL's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIEN and BXSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIENBXSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.91%

-36.80%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-23.47%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.49%

-24.21%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.54%

-22.50%

+11.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-14.12%

-6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

15.37%

-8.84%

Volatility

LIEN vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) at 5.04%. This indicates that LIEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIENBXSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.96%

5.04%

+4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

16.24%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.55%

19.90%

+7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.44%

23.73%

+15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.44%

23.73%

+15.71%

Dividends

LIEN vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

LIEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.85%, more than BXSL's 13.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
13.24%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%
LIEN
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc
13.85%13.17%8.95%15.76%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LIEN vs. BXSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
16.70M
0
(LIEN) Total Revenue
(BXSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LIEN and BXSL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIEN has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to BXSL (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIEN dropped -46.91% vs BXSL's -36.80%.

LIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIEN and BXSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer