LIEN vs. FDUS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS).

Performance

LIEN vs. FDUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LIEN vs. FDUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LIEN Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc	-6.23%	-3.99%	58.63%	-1.09%	-30.00%
FDUS Fidus Investment Corporation	-7.07%	2.08%	20.55%	20.02%	14.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIEN : $213.14M FDUS : $643.98M
EPS LIEN : $1.10 FDUS : $2.33
PE Ratio LIEN : 8.51 FDUS : 7.48
PS Ratio LIEN : 0.01 FDUS : 4.96
PB Ratio LIEN : 0.00 FDUS : 0.87
Total Revenue (TTM) LIEN : $14.26B FDUS : $126.37M
Gross Profit (TTM) LIEN : $29.54M FDUS : $75.32M
EBITDA (TTM) LIEN : $25.03M FDUS : $66.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIEN achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly higher than FDUS's -7.07% return.

LIEN

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -6.23%
• 6M: -4.66%
• 1Y: -5.25%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDUS

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: -7.07%
• 6M: -9.16%
• 1Y: -4.71%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 14.53%
• 10Y*: 12.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LIEN vs. FDUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIEN

LIEN Risk / Return Rank: 27
LIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
LIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FDUS

FDUS Risk / Return Rank: 30
FDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIEN vs. FDUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIEN	FDUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	-0.21	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	-0.13	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.98	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	-0.33	-0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	-0.74	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIEN vs. FDUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is comparable to the FDUS Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIEN and FDUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIEN	FDUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19	-0.21	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.38	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between LIEN and FDUS is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LIEN vs. FDUS - Dividend Comparison

LIEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than FDUS's 12.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIEN Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc	14.56%	13.17%	8.95%	15.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDUS Fidus Investment Corporation	12.23%	11.14%	11.51%	14.63%	10.51%	8.90%	10.15%	10.78%	13.69%	10.54%	10.17%	11.69%

Drawdowns

LIEN vs. FDUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIEN drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, smaller than the maximum FDUS drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIEN and FDUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIEN	FDUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.91%	-68.76%	+21.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.92%	-16.45%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.92%	-14.68%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.50%	-8.90%	-11.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.60%	7.39%	-0.79%

Volatility

LIEN vs. FDUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) is 6.37%, while Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that LIEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIEN	FDUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	7.64%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.32%	14.72%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.41%	22.87%	+4.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.86%	19.66%	+20.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.86%	33.49%	+6.37%

Financials

LIEN vs. FDUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc and Fidus Investment Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LIEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 14.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FDUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidus Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 30.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LIEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 14.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FDUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidus Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 30.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LIEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 14.23B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

FDUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidus Investment Corporation reported a net income of 19.63M and revenue of 30.88M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.