LIEN vs. BLV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV).

BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.

Performance

LIEN vs. BLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LIEN vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LIEN Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc	-6.23%	-3.99%	58.63%	-1.09%	-30.00%
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF	-0.32%	6.44%	-3.65%	7.35%	-22.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIEN achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly lower than BLV's -0.32% return.

LIEN

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -6.23%
• 6M: -4.66%
• 1Y: -5.25%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLV

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -3.51%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: -0.68%
• 1Y: 2.33%
• 3Y*: 1.01%
• 5Y*: -3.05%
• 10Y*: 1.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LIEN vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIEN

LIEN Risk / Return Rank: 27
LIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
LIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BLV

BLV Risk / Return Rank: 19
BLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BLV Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BLV Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIEN vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIEN	BLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	0.24	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	0.38	-0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.05	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	0.43	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	1.04	-2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIEN vs. BLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the BLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIEN and BLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIEN	BLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19	0.24	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.37	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between LIEN and BLV is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

LIEN vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison

LIEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than BLV's 4.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIEN Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc	14.56%	13.17%	8.95%	15.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF	4.73%	4.67%	5.09%	4.06%	4.17%	3.37%	6.12%	3.57%	4.07%	3.63%	4.16%	4.37%

Drawdowns

LIEN vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIEN drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, which is greater than BLV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIEN and BLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIEN	BLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.91%	-38.29%	-8.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.92%	-6.89%	-6.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.92%	-24.59%	+9.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.50%	-9.37%	-11.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.60%	2.84%	+3.76%

Volatility

LIEN vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 3.54%. This indicates that LIEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIEN	BLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	3.54%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.32%	5.50%	+10.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.41%	9.77%	+17.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.86%	12.98%	+26.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.86%	11.99%	+27.87%