PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIEN vs. HHIS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LIEN
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc
-6.23%5.59%
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
-15.68%30.47%
Different Trading Currencies

LIEN is traded in USD, while HHIS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HHIS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIEN achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly higher than HHIS.TO's -15.68% return.


LIEN

1D
0.32%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
-6.23%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
-5.25%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
10Y*

HHIS.TO

1D
1.95%
1M
-6.64%
YTD
-15.68%
6M
-15.45%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIEN
LIEN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

HHIS.TO
HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIENHHIS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

0.82

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.09

1.42

-1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.19

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

1.12

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.03

3.24

-4.27

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIEN and HHIS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIENHHIS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

0.82

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.23

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between LIEN and HHIS.TO is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO - Dividend Comparison

LIEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, less than HHIS.TO's 28.51% yield.


TTM202520242023
LIEN
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc
14.56%13.17%8.95%15.76%
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
28.51%22.88%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIEN drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, which is greater than HHIS.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIEN and HHIS.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LIENHHIS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.91%

-31.83%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-24.43%

+11.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.92%

-23.04%

+8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-8.76%

-11.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.60%

9.10%

-2.50%

Volatility

LIEN vs. HHIS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc (LIEN) is 6.37%, while Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that LIEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HHIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LIENHHIS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

8.41%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

19.21%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.41%

32.82%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.86%

36.21%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.86%

36.21%

+3.65%