PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTM vs. KGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DTM vs. KGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) and Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTM achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly lower than KGS's 82.64% return.


DTM

1D
2.19%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
18.88%
6M
20.39%
1Y
36.34%
3Y*
49.32%
5Y*
10Y*

KGS

1D
2.94%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
82.64%
6M
97.53%
1Y
95.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTM vs. KGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DTM
DT Midstream, Inc.
18.88%24.13%88.95%13.54%
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
82.64%-3.73%115.21%30.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DTM and KGS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.48

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DTM:

$14.52B

KGS:

$5.88B

EPS

DTM:

$4.55

KGS:

$0.77

PE Ratio

DTM:

31.06

KGS:

87.08

PEG Ratio

DTM:

3.18

KGS:

8.80

PS Ratio

DTM:

11.37

KGS:

4.47

PB Ratio

DTM:

3.05

KGS:

5.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

DTM:

$1.28B

KGS:

$1.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DTM:

$810.00M

KGS:

$487.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

DTM:

$1.06B

KGS:

$469.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTM vs. KGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTM
DTM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

KGS
KGS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
KGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
KGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTM vs. KGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) and Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTMKGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.74

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

3.34

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

6.20

-2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.89

15.35

-5.46

DTM vs. KGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the KGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTM and KGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTMKGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.74

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.93

-0.62

Drawdowns

DTM vs. KGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTM drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum KGS drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTM and KGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTMKGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-38.57%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-15.95%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-11.46%

+5.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-11.45%

+5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

6.44%

-2.51%

Volatility

DTM vs. KGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) is 6.02%, while Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that DTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTMKGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

13.36%

-7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

25.12%

-9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

34.97%

-13.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

37.91%

-12.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

37.91%

-12.34%

Dividends

DTM vs. KGS - Dividend Comparison

DTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than KGS's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DTM
DT Midstream, Inc.
2.36%2.74%2.96%5.04%4.63%2.50%
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
2.86%4.81%3.87%1.89%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DTM vs. KGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DT Midstream, Inc. and Kodiak Gas Services Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
336.00M
345.76M
(DTM) Total Revenue
(KGS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DTM vs. KGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DT Midstream, Inc. and Kodiak Gas Services Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.7%
0
Portfolio components
DTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported a gross profit of 251.00M and revenue of 336.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.7%.

KGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 345.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.00M and revenue of 336.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

KGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 106.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

DTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported a net income of 134.00M and revenue of 336.00M, resulting in a net margin of 39.9%.

KGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 17.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DTM and KGS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGS has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to DTM (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTM dropped -23.56% vs KGS's -38.57%.

KGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTM and KGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer