PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LI vs. BYDDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LI vs. BYDDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc. (LI) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -19.49% return, which is significantly lower than BYDDF's -2.04% return.


LI

1D
1.04%
1M
13.39%
6M
-18.04%
YTD
-19.49%
1Y
-46.00%
3Y*
-32.53%
5Y*
-16.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.12%

BYDDF

1D
-0.83%
1M
16.57%
6M
-4.12%
YTD
-2.04%
1Y
-16.40%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
20.02%
ALL TIME*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.14M$3.82M$3.45M
$48.29M$50.28M$65.28M

LI vs. BYDDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LI
Li Auto Inc.
-19.49%-29.43%-35.91%83.48%-36.45%11.34%86.00%
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
-2.04%11.38%24.71%13.22%-27.71%28.77%171.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LI and BYDDF is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.56

The correlation between LI and BYDDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LI:

$13.77B

BYDDF:

$108.56B

EPS

LI:

-CN¥1.76

BYDDF:

CN¥3.02

PS Ratio

LI:

0.86

BYDDF:

0.93

PB Ratio

LI:

1.34

BYDDF:

2.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

LI:

CN¥108.98B

BYDDF:

CN¥783.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LI:

CN¥17.42B

BYDDF:

CN¥132.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

LI:

-CN¥2.83B

BYDDF:

CN¥68.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LI vs. BYDDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LI
LI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BYDDF
BYDDF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BYDDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYDDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYDDF Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BYDDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYDDF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LI vs. BYDDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIBYDDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.94

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.49

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-1.04

-0.39

LI vs. BYDDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the BYDDF Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI and BYDDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LI vs. BYDDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -74.83%, smaller than the maximum BYDDF drawdown of -86.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and BYDDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIBYDDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.83%

-86.78%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.01%

-38.50%

-17.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.83%

-51.26%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.83%

-51.26%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.78%

-37.65%

-33.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-40.98%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.53%

17.96%

+15.57%

Volatility

LI vs. BYDDF - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc. (LI) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) have volatilities of 10.33% and 9.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIBYDDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.33%

9.85%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.76%

28.02%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.17%

36.38%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.23%

44.97%

+17.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.80%

47.16%

+20.64%

Dividends

LI vs. BYDDF - Dividend Comparison

LI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
0.44%6.04%1.28%0.58%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.58%0.00%2.03%
LI
Li Auto Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LI vs. BYDDF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and BYD Company Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LI vs. BYDDF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Li Auto Inc. and BYD Company Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

BYDDF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.

LI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.

BYDDF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BYD Company Limited reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

LI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.

BYDDF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LI and BYDDF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LI has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to BYDDF (9.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -74.83% vs BYDDF's -86.78%.

BYDDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LI and BYDDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer