LI vs. XIACY
LI (Li Auto Inc.) and XIACY (Xiaomi Corporation) are both stocks. LI operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while XIACY operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LI returned -16.29%/yr vs -3.04%/yr for XIACY. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LI vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -24.28% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -40.25% return.
LI
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -19.32%
- YTD
- -24.28%
- 6M
- -24.50%
- 1Y
- -50.71%
- 3Y*
- -27.19%
- 5Y*
- -16.29%
- 10Y*
- —
XIACY
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- -20.91%
- YTD
- -40.25%
- 6M
- -40.93%
- 1Y
- -55.98%
- 3Y*
- 33.61%
- 5Y*
- -3.04%
- 10Y*
- —
LI vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | -24.28% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 13.03% |
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | -40.25% | 15.23% | 118.16% | 45.75% | -42.42% | -35.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LI and XIACY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between LI and XIACY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
LI:
$13.00B
XIACY:
$79.62B
LI:
-CN¥1.74
XIACY:
CN¥6.64
LI:
0.82
XIACY:
1.22
LI:
1.26
XIACY:
2.03
LI:
CN¥108.98B
XIACY:
CN¥442.33B
LI:
CN¥17.42B
XIACY:
CN¥97.61B
LI:
-CN¥2.83B
XIACY:
CN¥40.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LI vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank
LI
XIACY
LI vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LI | XIACY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.73 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.91 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.55 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LI vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -72.52%, roughly equal to the maximum XIACY drawdown of -71.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and XIACY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LI | XIACY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.52% | -71.03% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.69% | -61.88% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.52% | -61.88% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.52% | -70.06% | -2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.52% | -61.88% | -10.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.04% | -39.39% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.25% | 36.08% | +2.17% |
Volatility
LI vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison
Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) at 10.67%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LI | XIACY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 10.67% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.04% | 27.25% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.21% | 39.13% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.47% | 46.48% | +16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.25% | 46.47% | +21.78% |
Dividends
LI vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison
Neither LI nor XIACY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LI vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LI vs. XIACY - Profitability Comparison
LI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
XIACY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
LI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
XIACY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
LI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
XIACY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LI and XIACY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to XIACY (10.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -72.52% vs XIACY's -71.03%.
LI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.27 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LI and XIACY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer