PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LI vs. XIACY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LIXIACY
YTD Return-29.60%8.68%
1Y Return15.02%57.83%
3Y Return (Ann)10.12%-9.89%
Sharpe Ratio0.201.33
Daily Std Dev58.97%41.58%
Max Drawdown-69.02%-76.86%
Current Drawdown-43.52%-52.98%

Fundamentals


LIXIACY
Market Cap$25.09B$55.29B
EPS$1.53$0.48
PE Ratio16.3723.10
PEG Ratio0.992.68
Revenue (TTM)$123.85B$270.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)$8.79B$47.58B
EBITDA (TTM)$9.21B$18.29B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LI and XIACY is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LI vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -29.60% return, which is significantly lower than XIACY's 8.68% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
60.09%
15.12%
LI
XIACY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Li Auto Inc.

Xiaomi Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LI vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LI, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LI, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LI, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LI, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LI, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.49
XIACY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XIACY, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XIACY, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.01
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XIACY, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XIACY, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XIACY, currently valued at 4.66, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.66

LI vs. XIACY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the XIACY Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LI and XIACY.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.20
1.33
LI
XIACY

Dividends

LI vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison

Neither LI nor XIACY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LI vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, smaller than the maximum XIACY drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and XIACY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-43.52%
-52.98%
LI
XIACY

Volatility

LI vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) at 10.50%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.31%
10.50%
LI
XIACY

Financials

LI vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items