PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LI vs. XIACY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LI vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LI vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LI
Li Auto Inc.
5.32%-29.43%-35.91%83.48%-36.45%3.95%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
-17.82%15.23%118.16%45.75%-42.42%-33.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LI:

$18.58B

XIACY:

$108.12B

EPS

LI:

$1.08

XIACY:

$7.80

PE Ratio

LI:

16.44

XIACY:

2.65

PS Ratio

LI:

0.17

XIACY:

0.24

PB Ratio

LI:

0.26

XIACY:

0.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

LI:

$112.12B

XIACY:

$455.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LI:

$20.95B

XIACY:

$101.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

LI:

$935.07M

XIACY:

$47.43B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -17.82% return.


LI

1D
1.60%
1M
1.36%
YTD
5.32%
6M
-29.64%
1Y
-29.25%
3Y*
-10.60%
5Y*
-6.72%
10Y*

XIACY

1D
1.57%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
-17.82%
6M
-40.45%
1Y
-34.56%
3Y*
39.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LI vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LI
LI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XIACY
XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIXIACYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.71

-0.73

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.88

-0.94

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.89

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

-0.73

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

-1.34

+0.38

LI vs. XIACY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the XIACY Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI and XIACY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIXIACYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

-0.73

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.07

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between LI and XIACY is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LI vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison

Neither LI nor XIACY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LI vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, roughly equal to the maximum XIACY drawdown of -70.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and XIACY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LIXIACYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.02%

-70.71%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.53%

-49.29%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.78%

-47.57%

-14.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.13%

-38.43%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.30%

26.77%

+4.53%

Volatility

LI vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Li Auto Inc. (LI) is 12.54%, while Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that LI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LIXIACYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.54%

14.54%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.36%

28.33%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.26%

47.25%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.22%

46.87%

+17.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.97%

46.87%

+22.10%

Financials

LI vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
28.38B
115.30B
(LI) Total Revenue
(XIACY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LI vs. XIACY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Li Auto Inc. and Xiaomi Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
17.8%
20.8%
Portfolio components
LI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.06B and revenue of 28.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 24.03B and revenue of 115.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

LI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -525.67M and revenue of 28.38B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.9%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 3.15B and revenue of 115.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

LI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of 6.43M and revenue of 28.38B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 6.45B and revenue of 115.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.