LI vs. VIPS
LI (Li Auto Inc.) and VIPS (Vipshop Holdings Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LI in Auto Manufacturers, VIPS in Internet Retail. Over the past 5 years, LI returned -16.41%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for VIPS. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LI vs. VIPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -19.49% return, which is significantly lower than VIPS's -9.68% return.
LI
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 13.39%
- 6M
- -18.04%
- YTD
- -19.49%
- 1Y
- -46.00%
- 3Y*
- -32.53%
- 5Y*
- -16.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.12%
VIPS
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 15.69%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- -3.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.29M | $50.28M | $65.28M | |
| $22.16M | $27.51M | $35.22M |
LI vs. VIPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | -19.49% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 86.00% |
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited | -9.68% | 36.31% | -22.25% | 30.21% | 62.38% | -70.12% | 28.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LI and VIPS is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.41 |
The correlation between LI and VIPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LI:
$13.77B
VIPS:
$7.55B
LI:
-CN¥1.76
VIPS:
CN¥14.96
LI:
0.86
VIPS:
0.49
LI:
1.34
VIPS:
1.24
LI:
CN¥108.98B
VIPS:
CN¥106.06B
LI:
CN¥17.42B
VIPS:
CN¥24.86B
LI:
-CN¥2.83B
VIPS:
CN¥9.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LI vs. VIPS — Risk / Return Rank
LI
VIPS
LI vs. VIPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LI | VIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.06 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.17 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 0.31 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LI vs. VIPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -74.83%, smaller than the maximum VIPS drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and VIPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LI | VIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.83% | -86.75% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.01% | -34.93% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.83% | -39.32% | -35.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.83% | -65.88% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.78% | -62.70% | -8.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.65% | -48.55% | +7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.53% | 19.17% | +14.36% |
Volatility
LI vs. VIPS - Volatility Comparison
Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) at 6.45%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LI | VIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.33% | 6.45% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.76% | 22.20% | +7.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.17% | 32.65% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.23% | 52.08% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.80% | 55.30% | +12.50% |
Dividends
LI vs. VIPS - Dividend Comparison
LI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited | 4.04% | 2.71% | 3.19% |
Financials
LI vs. VIPS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Vipshop Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LI vs. VIPS - Profitability Comparison
LI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
VIPS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 26.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
LI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
VIPS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
LI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
VIPS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vipshop Holdings Limited reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 26.41B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LI and VIPS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to VIPS (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -74.83% vs VIPS's -86.75%.
VIPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LI and VIPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer