LGRRX vs. LSGGX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

LGRRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) and LSGGX (Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - LGRRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis, while LSGGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 5 years, LGRRX returned 10.02%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for LSGGX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGRRX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LSGGX.

Performance

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRRX achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly higher than LSGGX's -8.81% return.

LGRRX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -6.71%
• YTD: -7.47%
• 6M: -9.01%
• 1Y: 1.34%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 10.02%
• 10Y*: 15.71%

LSGGX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -5.53%
• YTD: -8.81%
• 6M: -10.09%
• 1Y: -2.95%
• 3Y*: 12.43%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGRRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	-7.47%	13.76%	34.82%	50.89%	-28.03%	18.40%	31.40%	31.41%	-2.80%	32.29%
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	-8.81%	16.84%	23.30%	36.10%	-25.98%	5.89%	35.25%	30.63%	-6.70%	31.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRRX and LSGGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.93

The correlation between LGRRX and LSGGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGRRX vs. LSGGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRRX

LGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 4
LGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
LGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
LGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

LSGGX

LSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
LSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
LSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
LSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
LSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGRRX	LSGGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	-0.23	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	-0.19	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.98	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	-0.20	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.19	-0.48	+0.67

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the LSGGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRRX and LSGGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRRX drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, which is greater than LSGGX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRRX and LSGGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGRRX	LSGGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.70%	-37.72%	-26.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.93%	-21.08%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.84%	-22.21%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-37.72%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.58%	-13.80%	+3.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.21%	-7.63%	-13.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	7.99%	-2.20%

Volatility

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) is 6.31%, while Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that LGRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGRRX	LSGGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	6.99%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	14.10%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.69%	18.44%	-0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.03%	22.17%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.07%	20.57%	+0.50%

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRRX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than LSGGX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGRRX vs. LSGGX - Dividend Comparison

LGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than LSGGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGRRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	2.70%	2.50%	6.30%	6.70%	18.14%	5.13%	4.60%	2.68%	5.92%	2.33%	1.38%	0.42%
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	0.33%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	7.77%	7.38%	6.15%	5.74%	4.78%	3.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGRRX and LSGGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, LGRRX and LSGGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LGRRX or LSGGX?

LSGGX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to LGRRX (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRRX dropped -64.70% vs LSGGX's -37.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LGRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.